{"id":416,"date":"2009-11-09T05:14:40","date_gmt":"2009-11-08T19:14:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/digitalharlemblog.wordpress.com\/?page_id=416"},"modified":"2009-11-09T05:14:40","modified_gmt":"2009-11-08T19:14:40","slug":"reviews","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/playing-the-numbers-the-book\/reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"Reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"

Blurbs from Robin D. G. Kelley, Ira Berlin, Leon Litwack and James T. Campbell, at Harvard University Press<\/a><\/p>\n

Wall Street Journal<\/a><\/p>\n

New York Post<\/a><\/p>\n

The Atlantic<\/a><\/p>\n

Australian Book Review<\/a><\/p>\n

New York History blog<\/a><\/p>\n

Left History<\/a><\/p>\n

Journal of American History<\/a><\/p>\n

Australasian Journal of American Studies (30, 1, July 2011, 112-113)<\/p>\n

History: Reviews of New Books (40, 3, 2012, 79-80)<\/p>\n

“Interchange: The History of Capitalism,”\u00a0Journal of American History<\/em> 101, 2 (September 2014): 528-29<\/a><\/p>\n

One of the more intriguing books to emerge is Playing the Numbers (2010). Examining the illegal lotteries organized by African Americans and Afro-Caribbean migrants in Harlem during the 1920s, the authors argue that such forms of financial organization were of such a scale and of such import that they need to be seen alongside the work of Marcus Garvey’s Universal Negro Improvement Association. The authors also implicitly suggest the possibilities for thinking of the history of forms of economic organization and financial institutions on the margins of the formal market as economic and political forces.<\/p>\n

Monographs such as Playing the Numbers suggest that we need to consider not only those modes of exchange and financial and economic organization that are outside of the formal market but also how they are often a necessary component of capitalist regimes of accumulation. Instead of trying to draw clear lines between precapitalist and capitalist forms or noncapitalist and capitalist forms of exchange and accumulation, it seems more productive to try to understand how, in many cases, the former\u2014precapitalist modes of accumulation\u2014are mobilized, used, and continued by the latter\u2014especially in those regions where the transition to capitalism was contingent, provisional, and unfinished. (PETER<\/span>\u00a0JAMES<\/span>\u00a0HUDSON)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Journal of Urban History 41, 6 (2015): 1152-59<\/a> [Review Essay]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Blurbs from Robin D. G. Kelley, Ira Berlin, Leon Litwack and James T. Campbell, at Harvard University Press Wall Street…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":360,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-416","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PaM3Ks-6I","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/416\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drstephenrobertson.com\/digitalharlemblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}